Plans by Iran to install advanced centrifuges at its main nuclear enrichment plant in Natanz are ‘deeply worrying’, Britain, France and Germany said on Monday. 

The three governments said plans approved by Iran’s parliament for a further expansion of the nuclear programme were contrary to a 2015 agreement between Tehran and world powers.

The Daily Mail reports:

The deal, which the US abandoned in 2018 but which president-elect Joe Biden says he wants to re-enter, is ‘the best and currently the only way to monitor and constrain Iran’s nuclear programme,’ the three countries said.

The UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reported last month that Iran had installed and begun operating advanced centrifuges at an underground section at Natanz. 

Under the terms of Iran’s 2015 deal it is only meant to enrich uranium with a less sophisticated variety of centrifuges. 

Since May last year Iran has taken steps to violate that limit and several others laid down in the deal in retaliation for Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the deal. 

‘Iran’s recent announcement to the IAEA that it intends to install an additional three cascades of advanced centrifuges at the Fuel Enrichment Plant in Natanz is contrary to the [deal] and deeply worrying,’ Britain, France and Germany said. 

The three European powers said they had noted ‘with great concern’ a law passed by the Iranian parliament that would expand Iran’s nuclear programme. 

They also criticised the law for limiting the IAEA’s monitoring access, saying this too would be ‘incompatible’ with the deal and ‘Iran’s wider nuclear commitments’.

The bill ‘for the lifting of sanctions and protection of the Iranian people’s interests’ was approved by the powerful Guardian Council on Wednesday but has to be signed by president Hassan Rouhani to become law.

Read more at the Daily Mail

FREE COPY: Understanding the threat from Iran

Covering the threat from Iran to Israel and the West, plus the plight of the Iranian people: Read our Operation Mordecai campaign booklet online or receive a FREE copy by post.

Related Articles:

A Holy Land without Israel?

Archbishop Sarah Mullally's pilgrimage to the "Holy Land" appeared to overlook the Jewish people’s Biblical, historical and present-day connection to the Land. The Archbishop rightly showed concern...

America owes its existence to the land of Israel

A common phrase we have been hearing from President Donald Trump in the last few weeks is that Israel would not exist if it wasn't for him. "Without me, there would be no Israel - because no other...

Since when did it become acceptable to bully Jews outside a UK synagogue?

Hundreds of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered outside a London synagogue, using an event advertising property in Israel to target a Jewish place of worship with anti-Israel slurs.The...

Parliament’s Israel obsession fuels antisemitism – as does the UK’s funding of the PA

Did you know that the UK Parliament is obsessed with Israel? We had a feeling it might be, but it appears Israel is debated more than some key domestic topics. In this article: Parliament has been...

Two-tier policing fears: When a UK policing body calls Zionism “anti-Muslim hatred”, public trust is at stake

Can Jewish victims trust policing when a Muslim policing body brands Zionism as hate? Revelations concerning the National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) are a serious wake-up call. The group...

Subscribe to start receiving FREE TORCH magazines from CUFI UK