Watch this in-depth discussion on the core issues of the recent clashes on the Temple Mount and indeed the entire Israel-Palestinian conflict.

Both analysts agree that the issue is not one of the land but one of ideology, stating that Israel has for too long tried to appease the other side and given concessions in the hopes that it will calm down the situation. however, they argue that the opposite effects occur. The more Israel gives, the more the other side tries to take seeing concessions as a sign of weakness.

An interesting look at how the Temple Mount and Israel’s authority over it are imperative to Israel’s survival.

Related Articles:

Who broke the ceasefire? Israel or Hamas?

When the IDF carried out airstrikes over Gaza this week, almost every mainstream news outlet reported that Israel had broken the ceasefire. Many were eager to use this misinformation to...

“I had to speak up” – Gal Gadot doubles down on support for Israel despite attempts to disrupt her Hollywood star ceremony

“I had to speak up” – these are the words of Israeli actress, Gal Gadot, who this week received a star in her honour on the famous Hollywood Walk of Fame.“I’m just a girl from a town in...

The UN issues yet another antisemitic blood libel against Israel

At Christians United for Israel (CUFI), we have long called out the anti-Israel bias at the United Nations (UN). Unfortunately, it seems the global body is increasingly keen of...

Understanding Haman: and why that matters

One of Britain's top universities this week hosted an event to promote the book, Understanding Hamas: and why that matters. Whilst universities should be arenas of free speech, they...

The illusion of the Palestinian cause

British journalist Melanie Phillips said some profound and provocative statements in an interview with Sky News Australia last month, and we thought it was worth raising the...