A Twitter official has caused shock this week over the media giants absurd double standards concerning tweets from world leaders.

Ayatollah Khamenei has called for the literal genocide of Israel and the Jewish people and has not been restricted in any way by Twitter. President Trump, on the other hand, made a tweet regarding law and order against violent riots and was restricted by Twitter for “inciting violence”.

The argument against this decision by Twitter is not to say that any tweet is correct or that Twitter should limit either tweet, but simply that it is unacceptable for the company to apply this double standard. It fuels the belief by some that social media platforms are purposely hindering the reach of right-wing politicians and allowing left-wing politicians to have free reign.

This is especially apparent when the leader of a free country is limited for a tweet that could be interpreted in a number of ways whilst the leader of a brutal dictatorship, whose government funds terrorism against Israel and the Jewish people, calls for actual genocide against Israel and the Jewish people. If that is not inciting violence, then what is?

Twitter’s explanation, to the audible shock of Israeli politicians present, was that Khamenei’s calls for genocide were mere “foreign policy sabre-rattling”, whilst Trump’s tweet regarding the violent riots in America following George Floyd’s death “incited violence”.

“We have an approach toward leaders that says that direct interactions with fellow public figures, comments on political issues of the day, or foreign policy sabre-rattling on military-economic issues are generally not in violation of our rules,” Ylwa Pettersson, Twitter’s head policy for the Nordic countries and Israel, told the Knesset’s Committee for Immigration, Absorption and Diaspora Affairs, via video-conference.

She was responding to a question by pro-Israel activist Arsen Ostrovsky, who had asked why Twitter attached a special label to a recent tweet by US President Donald Trump noting that it violated the company’s rules, while the Iranian leaders’ many tweets about his wish for Israel to be destroyed are left untouched.

“I just want to fine-tune [Ostrovsky’s] question: Calling for genocide on Twitter is okay, but commenting on the political situation in certain countries is not okay?” asked MK Michal Cotler-Wunsh, who was leading the discussion.

“If a world leader violates our rules but there is a clear interest in keeping that up on the service we may place it behind a notice that provides some more context about the violation and allows people to click through if they wish to see that type of content,” Pettersson replied.

“That’s what happened for the Trump tweet: that tweet was violating our policies regarding the glorification of violence based on the historical context of the last line of that tweet and the risk that it could possibly inspire harm and similar actions.”

Trump’s May 29 tweet spoke about how violent riots were dishonouring to the memory of George Floyd and called for an end to violent riots, ended with the words: “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”

In addition to the warning label, Twitter disabled the public’s ability to “like” the post, but decided not to remove it “so the citizens can see what their political figures are commenting [on] and hold them accountable for it online,” said Pettersson, who spoke to the Knesset meeting via Zoom.

“Wow. Twitter just admitted that tweets calling for genocide against Jews by Iranian leaders DON’T violate its policy!”, Cotler-Wunsh tweeted after the session ended. “This is a double standard. This is antisemitism.”

FREE COPY: Understanding the threat from Iran

Covering the threat from Iran to Israel and the West, plus the plight of the Iranian people: Read our Operation Mordecai campaign booklet online or receive a FREE copy by post.

Related Articles:

Pope Francis’s Palestinian appeasement showed weakness to Hamas and bias against Israel

Hamas never misses an opportunity to spread its aims. Some might say that Hamas’s message of condolences for Pope Francis was just an attempt by terrorists to be relevant in the eyes of...

ICC Fail: Appeals Court finds ‘error of law’, rules in favour of Israel

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has become a kangaroo court that has been weaponised by Israel’s enemies to smear the Jewish state, forcing Israel to defend itself from false...

If the Terrorism Act is worth protecting, it is also worth applying

The British lawyers representing Hamas to try and de-proscribe the terror group are not your average High Street legal team.According to Jewish Chronicle, one of the lawyers described...

80 years since British forces liberated Bergen-Belsen concentration camp

On the 15th April 1945, British forces liberated the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in Germany. On Tuesday, eighty years to the day, we remember the tens of thousands of Jewish lives...

Labour’s overreaction to Israel deporting two MPs shows government’s double standard

The Labour government went into meltdown this week after Israel barred two of its Members of Parliament from entering Israel. But Israel, a sovereign democratic nation that is currently...